Studies in Philosophy and Education 22 (5):351-370 (2003)
|Abstract||In the article texts by John Dewey, JÃ¼rgenHabermas and Richard Rorty are discussed in thelight of different meanings of the Public. Thisis done by discussing foundational andnon-foundational claims on a philosophy ofpragmatism and democracy, and by looking atdifferent meanings of intersubjectivity. Onecrucial difference I am pointing at, is thatwhile Dewey's intersubjectivity is stemmingfrom philosophical arguments as well aspolitical, Habermas's intersubjectivity isrestricted to the level of (an almostscientific) philosophical abstractargumentation without any concrete language ofpolitics. When it comes to Rorty I stress thathe is far closer than Habermas to Dewey'spragmatism, especially his ambition to includethe specific individuals and to stressindividuality in a philosophy of communicationand public conduct|
|Keywords||foundationalism individuality intersubjectivity non-fondationalism pragmatism The Public radical democracy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joseph Grange (1996). The Disappearance of the Public Good: Confucius, Dewey, Rorty. Philosophy East and West 46 (3):351-366.
Noëlle McAfee (2004). Public Knowledge. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):139-157.
Mark Whipple (2005). The Dewey-Lippmann Debate Today: Communication Distortions, Reflective Agency, and Participatory Democracy. Sociological Theory 23 (2):156-178.
Geneviève Souillac (2012). The Burden of Democracy: The Claims of Cultures and Public Culture. Lexington Books.
John Dewey (1927/1991). The Public and its Problems. Swallow Press.
Geneviève Souillac (2012). The Burden of Democracy: The Claims of Cultures, Public Culture, and Democratic Memory. Lexington Books.
Jim Garrison (1995). Dewey's Philosophy and the Experience of Working: Labor, Tools and Language. Synthese 105 (1):87 - 114.
Codruţa Cuceu (2011). Milestones in the Critique of the Public Sphere: Dewey and Arendt. Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):99-110.
Peggy Ruth Geren (2001). Public Discourse: Creating the Conditions for Dialogue Concerning the Common Good in a Postmodern Heterogeneous Democracy. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):191-199.
Paul Schollmeier (2008). What is a Public? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:721-728.
Hsin-I. Liu (2006). The Impossibility of the Public. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:119-124.
Matthew Weinshall (2003). Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas's Theory of Democracy. Critical Review 15 (1-2):23-58.
Cui Zhang (2008). Setting up a new model of the democratic theory ‐ research on Habermas' theory of public sphere. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:1095-1103.
David S. Allen (1995). Separating the Press and the Public. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (4):197 – 209.
John T. Lysaker (1996). The Shape of Selves to Come: Rorty and Self-Creation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):39-74.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?