Graduate studies at Western
Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):39-61 (2001)
|Abstract||Based on Merleau-Ponty's description of nature as that on which we ultimately rely, this essay cultivates the thought that this description also fits an idea of God and therefore of Deus sive Natura. Guided by an outline for a phenomenology of climbing, it is argued that what Heidegger calls readiness to hand presupposes readiness-to-foot (Zufussenheit). The latter gives ground for gratitude not only because it gives ground for enjoyment as gratification, but because it also gives ground for joy understood as a grace, grace understood as having its ground in Natura.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michele F. Epstein (1975). The Common Ground of Merleau-Ponty's and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Man. Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (2):221-234.
Mark J. Thomas (2009). In Search of Ground. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:99-111.
David Hunter (2007). Common Ground and Modal Disagreement. In H. V. Hanson (ed.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground.
Michael Dummett (1973). Frege's Way Out: A Footnote to a Footnote. Analysis 33 (4):139 - 140.
Michael J. Raven (2012). In Defence of Ground. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):687 - 701.
Catriona Hanley (1999). Heidegger on Aristotle's “Metaphysical” God. Continental Philosophy Review 32 (1):19-28.
Carlos Fraenkel (2006). Maimonides' God and Spinoza's Deus Sive Natura. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):169-215.
Greg Johnson (2003). On the Importance of Reversibility in Deliberative Democracy. Social Philosophy Today 19:179-191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,562 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?