International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (4):519-539 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract One perspective in contemporary linguistic theory defends the idea that the language faculty may result from the combinations of diverse systems and principles. As a case study, I critique a recent proposal by Juan Uriagereka and colleagues according to which the evolutionary emergence of the language faculty can be identified through studying the computational structure of knots as present within the fossil record. I here argue that the ability to conceptualize and, thereby, create knots is not parasitic on the ability to conceptualize and create language. On the contrary, these two domains are entirely distinct, unrelatable in terms of their computational complexity, expressive power or, most importantly, in terms of their requisite mental operations and principles. The overall approach defended here can profitably be employed in the study of the relationship between language and thought, as I briefly discuss in the case of the role of language in spatial reorientation|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barry C. Smith (2008). What Remains of Our Knowledge of Language? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (22):557-75.
John M. Collins (2005). Faculty Disputes. Mind and Language 19 (5):503-33.
Marc Hauser, Chomsky D., Fitch Noam & W. Tecumseh (2002). The Faculty of Language: What is It, Who has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science 298 (22):1569-1579.
Michael Devitt (2006). Ignorance of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Yoav Yigael (2004). A Proposal for the Creation of a Human and Computer Metalanguage. World Futures 60 (7):535 – 546.
Elżbieta Łukasiewicz (2008). Czy język to projekt doskonały? Zasada ekonomii w strukturze języka i założeniach programu minimalistycznego. Filozofia Nauki 1.
Donald Davidson (1999). The Emergence of Thought. Erkenntnis 51 (1):511-21.
Johan De Smedt (2009). Cognitive Modularity in the Light of the Language Faculty. Logique et Analyse 208:373-387.
Nirmalangshu Mukherji (2003). Is C Hl Linguistically Specific? Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):289 – 308.
Christopher D. Viger (2005). Learning to Think: A Response to the Language of Thought Argument for Innateness. Mind and Language 20 (3):313-25.
Helen De Cruz & Pierre Pica (2008). Knowledge of Number and Knowledge of Language: Number as a Test Case for the Role of Language in Cognition. Philosophical Psychology 21 (4):437 – 441.
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2010). Embodied Cognition and Linguistic Comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):294-304.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-16
Total downloads2 ( #234,650 of 556,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?