David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):127-148 (2003)
This paper argues that self-deception cannot be explained without employing a depth-psychological ("psychodynamic") notion of the unconscious, and therefore that mainstream academic psychology must make space for such approaches. The paper begins by explicating the notion of a dynamic unconscious. Then a brief account is given of the "paradoxes" of self-deception. It is shown that a depth-psychological self of parts and subceptive agency removes any such paradoxes. Next, several competing accounts of self-deception are considered: an attentional account, a constructivist account, and a neo-Sartrean account. Such accounts are shown to face a general dilemma: either they are able only to explain unmotivated errors of self-perception--in which case they are inadequate for their intended purpose--or they are able to explain motivated self-deception, but do so only by being instantiation mechanisms for depth-psychological processes. The major challenge to this argument comes from the claim that self-deception has a "logic" different to other-deception--the position of Alfred Mele. In an extended discussion it is shown that any such account is explanatorily adequate only for some cases of self-deception--not by any means all. Concluding remarks leave open to further empirical work the scope and importance of depth-psychological approaches
|Keywords||Depth Psychology Self-deception Unconscious Psychodynamic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jean-Paul Sartre (1956). Being and Nothingness. Distributed by Random House.
Ernest R. Hilgard (1977). Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action. Wiley.
Alfred R. Mele (2001). Self-Deception Unmasked. Princeton University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1968). The Appeal to Tacit Knowledge in Psychological Explanation. Journal of Philosophy 65 (October):627-40.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Lockie (2014). Three Recent Frankfurt Cases. Philosophia 42 (4):1005-1032.
Kevin Lynch (2014). Self-Deception and Shifts of Attention. Philosophical Explorations 17 (1):63-75.
Similar books and articles
Eric Funkhouser (2009). Self-Deception and the Limits of Folk Psychology. Social Theory and Practice 35 (1):1-13.
Jose Luis Bermudez (1997). Defending Intentionalist Accounts of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):107-108.
Clancy W. Martin (ed.) (2009). The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Sturm (2007). Self-Deception, Rationality, and the Self. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):73-95.
Kent Bach (1988). Critical Notice. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception. University of California Press
Alfred R. Mele (1997). Understanding and Explaining Real Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
Lisa Damm (2011). Self-Deception About Emotion. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):254-270.
Alfred R. Mele (1999). Twisted Self-Deception. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):117-137.
Neil Van Leeuwen (2013). Self-Deception. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell
Robert Audi (1997). Self-Deception Vs. Self-Caused Deception: A Comment on Professor Mele. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads160 ( #22,410 of 1,902,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)45 ( #19,608 of 1,902,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?