Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 18 (3):265-278 (1996)
|Abstract||I develop a general framework for natural and human values based on the position that end value is constructed by persons, but not wholly referent to them, identify and analyze three hierarchically related levels of end value in relation to the functional values which support them and the held and ascribed values generated by entities possessing teleological value, use this framework to indicate the context in which economic values should be located, and assess the implications of the framework for environmental policy and future valuation work|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Aaron Ridley (2005). Vi *-Nietzsche and the Re-Evaluation of Values. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):155-175.
John Peterson (1999). Natural Law, End, And Virtue In Aquinas. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:397-413.
Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
R. Scott Webster (2010). Does the Australian National Framework for Values Education Stifle an Education for World Peace? Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (4):462-475.
Einar Aadland (2010). Values in Professional Practice: Towards a Critical Reflective Methodology. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):461-472.
Ian Thompson (2000). Sources of Values in the Environmental Design Professions: The Case of Landscape Architecture. Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (2):203 – 219.
Michael Lockwood (1996). End Value, Evaluation, and Natural Systems. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):265-278.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 722,951 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,951 )
How can I increase my downloads?