Hare on potentiality: A rejoinder
Bioethics 2 (4):343–352 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWlodek Rabinowicz & Bertil Strömberg (1996). What If I Were in His Shoes? On Hare's Argument for Preference Utilitarianism. Theoria 62 (1-2):95-123.
John R. Shook (2010). Peter Hare on the Philosophy of Curt John Ducasse. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):47-52.
Tom Carson (1993). Hare on Utilitarianism and Intuitive Morality. Erkenntnis 39 (3):305 - 331.
Michael Lockwood (1988). Warnock Versus Powell (and Harradine): When Does Potentiality Count? Bioethics 2 (3):187–213.
A. J. Dale (1985). Hare on Supervenience: Remarks on R.M. Hare's Supervenience. Mind 94 (October):599-600.
John J. McDermott (2010). Philosophical Remarks on Peter Hare. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):73-77.
Thomas L. Carson (1986). Hare's Defense of Utilitarianism. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):97 - 115.
John P. Lizza (2010). Potentiality and Persons at the Margins of Life. Diametros 26:44-57.
R. M. Hare (1988). When Does Potentiality Count? A Comment on Lockwood. Bioethics 2 (3):214–226.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #133,532 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
