Just what is wrong with the argument from analogy?

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (August):153-56 (1973)
A reply to hyslop and jackson, American philosophical quarterly, April 1972: I argue that the argument form analogy begs the question, Much as does the inductive justification of induction, Of which it is a version
Keywords Analogy  Epistemology  Induction  Minds  Hyslop, A
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,351
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Alec Hyslop (1975). A Reply to Don Locke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):68-69.
    Barry Maund (1974). What is Wrong with Locke's Objection? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):240 – 242.
    Similar books and articles
    Jane Heal (2000). Other Minds, Rationality and Analogy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement 74 (74):1-19.
    Alec Hyslop (1975). A Reply to Don Locke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):68-69.
    Alec Hyslop (1973). Criteria and Other Minds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (August):105-14.
    Alec Hyslop (1976). Other Minds as Theoretical Entities. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (August):158-61.
    P. R. Wilson (1964). On the Argument by Analogy. Philosophy of Science 31 (1):34-39.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    84 ( #12,362 of 1,088,388 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,388 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.