David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy 23 (3):347-361 (2008)
To fully understand human language, an evolved trait that develops in the young without formal instruction, it must be possible to observe language that has not been influenced by instruction. But in modern societies, much of the language that is used, and most of the language that is measured, is confounded by literacy and academic training. This diverts empirical attention from natural habits of speech, causing theorists to miss critical features of linguistic practice. To dramatize this point, I examine data from a special population––the canal boat children of early twentieth century England––whose language developed without academic influence, but was evaluated using instruments designed primarily for academic use. These data, taken together with related research, suggest that formal instruction can convert language from a purely biological trait that was selected, to a talent that was instructed, while altering the users of language themselves. I then review research indicating that formal instruction can also mask or distort inter-sexual differences in the social applications of language, a significant handicap to evolutionary theorizing. I conclude that if biological theories of language are to succeed, they must explain the spontaneous speaking practices of naturally behaving individuals.
|Keywords||Philosophy Evolutionary Biology Philosophy of Biology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Lakoff (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
Charles Read, Zhang Yun-Fei, Nie Hong-Yin & Ding Bao-Qing (1986). The Ability to Manipulate Speech Sounds Depends on Knowing Alphabetic Writing. Cognition 24 (1-2):31-44.
Otto Jespersen (1965). The Philosophy of Grammar. New York, Norton.
José Morais, Luz Cary, Jésus Alegria & Paul Bertelson (1979). Does Awareness of Speech as a Sequence of Phones Arise Spontaneously? Cognition 7 (4):323-331.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William P. Bechtel (1996). What Knowledge Must Be in the Head in Order to Acquire Language. In B. Velichkovsky & Duane M. Rumbaugh (eds.), Communicating Meaning: The Evolution and Development of Language. Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 45.
W. Tecumseh Fitch (2005). The Evolution of Language: A Comparative Review. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):193-203.
Ruth G. Millikan (2005). Language: A Biological Model. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Steven Walczak (2002). A Context-Based Computational Model of Language Acquisition by Infants and Children. Foundations of Science 7 (4):393-411.
Sissel Redse Jørgensen & Rani Lill Anjum (eds.) (2006). Tegn Som Språk. Gyldendal Akademisk.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #196,405 of 1,938,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #459,264 of 1,938,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?