|Abstract||contemporaries, Bayle and Locke. Unlike Bayle, but like Locke, Leibniz argues that reason and faith are in conformity. Nevertheless, in contrast to the account that he finds in Locke’s Essay, Leibniz does not reduce faith to a species of reasonable belief. Instead, he insists that, while faith must be grounded in reason, true or divine faith also requires a supernatural infusion of grace.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Kevin Hart (2002). Fides Et Ratio Et…. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):199-220.
Patrick L. Bourgeois (2002). Critical Philosophy and Post-Critical Faith. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):431-450.
Maria van der Schaar (2012). Locke on Judgement and Religious Toleration. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):41 - 68.
Gregory B. Sadler (2007). Philosophy Between Faith and Theology: Addresses to Catholic Intellectuals. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (3):528-532.
Patrick L. Bourgeois (2002). Philosophy at the Boundary of Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:1-21.
James C. Doig (1997). Medieval Reactions to the Encounter Between Faith and Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):279-280.
J. L. A. Garcia (1991). Reason Informed by Faith. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 65 (4):507-511.
Gregory A. Clark (2002). Reason in Faith. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):510-511.
Wioleta Polinska (1999). Faith and Reason in John Locke. Philosophy and Theology 11 (2):287-309.
Paul Lodge (2002). Leibniz, Bayle, and Locke on Faith and Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):575-600.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #106,476 of 550,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?