Christopher W. Tindale, acts of arguing, a rhetorical model of argument
Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1) (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChristopher W. Tindale (1996). The Logic of Torture. Social Theory and Practice 22 (3):349-374.
Christopher W. Tindale (1994). Totipotency and the Value of Embryonic Cells. Journal of Value Inquiry 28 (4):519-528.
Christopher W. Tindale (1984). Plato's "Lysis": A Reconsideration. Apeiron 18 (2):102 - 109.
Christopher Tindale (1986). Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 9 (4):301-318.
Mary Richardson (1986). Informal Logic: A Prolegomenon to Good Argument Leo Groarke and Christopher Tindale Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall Press, 1985. Pp. 70. Dialogue 25 (04):787-.
Lilian Bermejo-Luque (2010). Intrinsic Versus Instrumental Values of Argumentation: The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation. Argumentation 24 (4):453-474.
Christopher W. Tindale (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
