Literary Silences in Pascal, Rousseau, and Beckett
OUP Oxford (2003)
| Abstract | To explore literary silence is to explore the relationships between literary texts and the silence of the ineffable. It is to enquire what dynamics texts develop as they strive to 'say the unsayable', and it is to think literature as a silence that speaks itself. This study describes these literary and silent dynamics through readings of Pascal's Pensées, Rousseau's Rêveries, and Beckett's trilogy Molloy, Malone meurt, and L'Innommable. It contributes to our understanding of three major writers and challenges our idea of what silence is. The subject of silence and of the ineffable has a long philosophical and critical tradition. A careful study of this tradition reveals the dominance of a limiting dualistic understanding of silence and its relationship to noise or language: silence becomes the negative other, the beyond, about which there remains nothing to say. The study of literary silence seeks rather to trace a language that becomes its own silence. It compromises the attempt to think a silence that moves within and through texts, that is inherent to the literary expression. Central to this theoretical endeavour are thinkers like Derrida, Deleuze, Gadamer, and Vattimo (among several others). The theoretical understanding of silence permits an effective methodology for reading literary silence. Notions of repetition, the aporia and the implosion, which are developed in reference to Kierkegaard and Bataille, describe textual strategies of literary silence and structure the readings. Finally, the reading of literary silence has its point of reference in writers like Mallarmé, Blanchot, and Beckett. It is their texts that have taught us to become topological readers, to move in and out of texts' movements; they have shown us how the literary expression is irreducible to linear, meaning oriented language. As readers of such texts we have been prepared to read the dynamics of the unsayable, and finally to start discerning the silences of the literary. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $123.91 new (21% off) $123.91 used (21% off) $147.25 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 9780199266364 0199266360 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKalpana Seshadri (2012/2011). Humanimal: Race, Law, Language. University of Minnesota Press.
Kalpana Seshadri-Crooks (2012/2011). Humanimal: Race, Law, Language. University of Minnesota Press.
Chien-Hsing Ho (2012). The Nonduality of Speech and Silence: A Comparative Analysis of Jizang’s Thought on Language and Beyond. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (1):1-19.
Brooke Alan Trisel (2012). God's Silence as an Epistemological Concern. Philosophical Forum 43 (4):383-393.
Frank J. Hoffman (2002). Dao and Process. Asian Philosophy 12 (3):197 – 212.
Noam Reisner (2009). Milton and the Ineffable. OUP Oxford.
Roderick MacIver & Ann O'Shaughnessy (eds.) (2006/2009). Meditations on Nature, Meditations on Silence. North Atlantic Books.
Ian Phillips (forthcoming). Hallucinating Silence. In Dimitri Platchias & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Hallucination. MIT Press.
Michael Mikulak (2009). The Silence That Can Speak. Environmental Philosophy 6 (2):73-92.
John E. Petrovic (2003). Can We Forget to Censor Silence? A Rejoinder to Applebaum. Journal of Moral Education 32 (2):163-166.
Michael Ryan (2007). Literary Theory: A Practical Introduction. Blackwell Pub..
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-01-31Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
