Graduate studies at Western
Oxford University Press (2002)
|Abstract||David Hume's A Treatise of Human Nature is famous for its extreme skepticism. Louis Loeb argues that Hume's destructive conclusions have in fact obscured a constructive stage that Hume abandons prematurely. Working within a philosophical tradition that values tranquillity, Hume favors an epistemology that links justification with settled belief. Hume appeals to psychological stability to support his own epistemological assessments, both favorable regarding causal inference, and unfavorable regarding imaginative propensities. The theory's success in explaining Hume's epistemic distinctions gives way to pessimism, since Hume contends that reflection on beliefs is deeply destabilizing. So much the worse, Hume concludes, for placing a premium on reflection. Hume endorses and defends the position that stable beliefs of unreflective persons are justified, though they would not survive reflection. At the same time, Hume relishes the paradox that unreflective beliefs enjoy a preferred epistemic status and strains to establish it. Loeb introduces a series of amendments to the Treatise that secures a more positive result for justified belief while maintaining Hume's fundamental principles. In his review of Hume's applications of his epistemology, Loeb uncovers a stratum of psychological doctrine beyond associationism, a theory of conditions in which beliefs are felt to conflict and of the resolution of this uneasiness or dissonance. This theory of mental conflict is also essential to Hume's strategy for integrating empiricism about meaning with his naturalism. However, Hume fails to provide a general account of the conditions in which conflicting beliefs lead to persisting instability, so his theory is incomplete. Loeb explores Hume's concern with stability in reference to his discussions of belief, education, the probability of causes, unphilosophical probability, the belief in body, sympathy and moral judgment, and the passions, among other topics.|
|Keywords||Knowledge, Theory of|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.11 used (66% off) $26.42 new (48% off) $47.49 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B1489.L64 2002|
|ISBN(s)||0195146581 0195181042 9780195181043|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jack Lyons (2001). General Rules and the Justification of Probable Belief in Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 27 (2):247-278.
Louis E. Loeb (2004). Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise, Another Look- A Response to Erin Kelly, Frederick Schmitt, and Michael Williams. Hume Studies 30 (2):339-404.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Frederick F. Schmitt (2004). Loeb on Stability and Justification in Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 30 (2):297-327.
Saul Traiger (2010). Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy. Episteme 7 (1):42-57.
Jennifer Smalligan Marušić (2010). Does Hume Hold a Dispositional Account of Belief? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):155-183.
Louis E. Loeb (2006). Psychology, Epistemology, and Skepticism in Hume's Argument About Induction. Synthese 152 (3):321 - 338.
Louis E. Loeb (2001). Integrating Hume's Accounts of Belief and Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):279-303.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,074 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?