Was Descartes sincere in his appeal to the natural light?
Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (3):377-406 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam H. Trapnell (1988). The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light From Descartes to Berkeley. Voltaire Foundation at the Taylor Institution.
Stephen Gaukroger (1989). Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes's Conception of Inference. Clarendon Press.
Deborah Boyle (1999). Descartes' Natural Light Reconsidered. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (4):601-612.
John Morris (1973). Descartes' Natural Light. Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (2):169-187.
Deborah J. Brown (2011). Cartesian Functional Analysis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):75 - 92.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
John A. Schuster (2012). Physico-Mathematics and the Search for Causes in Descartes' Optics—1619–1637. Synthese 185 (3):467-499.
Jeffrey McDonough (forthcoming). Descartes' Dioptrics and Descartes' Optics. In Nolan Larry (ed.), The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon. Cambridge.
Samuel C. Rickless (2005). The Cartesian Fallacy Fallacy. Noûs 39 (2):309–336.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads31 ( #39,272 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,729 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
