Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):151-162 (2007)
|Abstract||I claim that differences in the importance attached to economic liberty are more important in debates over the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture than disagreements about the precautionary principle. I will argue this point by considering a case study: the decision by the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to grant nonregulated status to Roundup Ready soy. I will show that the unregulated release of this herbicide-resistant crop would not be acceptable morally unless one places a very high premium on economic liberty. This is true even if one takes a sound science attitude to unknown risks, rather than a precautionary attitude. I concede that it may not have been within APHIS’s legislative mandate to regulate Roundup Ready soy further, but for those of us who do not put a high premium on economic liberty, this only calls for extending regulatory oversight of GMOs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. Wendy Russell & Robert Sparrow (2008). The Case for Regulating Intragenic Gmos. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):153-181.
Mariëlle Matthee & Dominique Vermersch (2000). Are the Precautionary Principle and the International Trade of Genetically Modified Organisms Reconcilable? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):59-70.
Anne Ingeborg Myhr (2010). A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (6):501-525.
Kristian Toft (2012). GMOs and Global Justice: Applying Global Justice Theory to the Case of Genetically Modified Crops and Food. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (2):223-237.
Sean A. Weaver & Michael C. Morris (2005). Risks Associated with Genetic Modification: – An Annotated Bibliography of Peer Reviewed Natural Science Publications. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2):157-189.
Mikael Karlsson (2003). Ethics of Sustainable Development – a Study of Swedish Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (1):51-62.
Soemini Kasanmoentalib (1996). Science and Values in Risk Assessment: The Case of Deliberate Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (1):42-60.
Dane Scott (2005). The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Darryl R. J. Macer (ed.) (2008). Asia-Pacific Perspectives on Biotechnology and Bioethics. UNESCO Bangkok.
Paul Weirich (ed.) (2008). Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate. OUP USA.
Rob Carlson (2011). Staying Sober About Science. Hastings Center Report 41 (4):22-25.
Charles Lawson & Richard Hindmarsh (2008). Legitimising Regulatory Decision Making About Genetically Modified Organisms Under the Gene Technology Act 2000. In Barbara Ann Hocking (ed.), The Nexus of Law and Biology: New Ethical Challenges. Ashgate Pub. Company.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads45 ( #29,007 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #6,093 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?