David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We report and compare the performance of different learning algorithms based on data from cortical recordings. The task is to predict the orientation of visual stimuli from the activity of a population of simultaneously recorded neurons. We compare several ways of improving the coding of the input (i.e., the spike data) as well as of the output (i.e., the orientation), and report the results obtained using different kernel algorithms.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joseph Ramsey & Clark Glymour, Experiments on the Accuracy of Algorithms for Inferring the Structure of Genetic Regulatory Networks From Microarray Expression Levels.
Thomas Bartz-Beielstein (2008). How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo's Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing. Synthese 163 (3):385 - 396.
Keith E. Yandell (1990). The Nature of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):451-469.
Donald Ervin Knuth (2010). Selected Papers on Design of Algorithms. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Christian Huyck & Ian Mitchell (2005). It is Not Evolution, but a Better Game Would Need a Better Agent. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):499-500.
Sven Ove Hansson (1994). Kernel Contraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):845-859.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #422,876 of 1,096,707 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #271,187 of 1,096,707 )
How can I increase my downloads?