David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
We report and compare the performance of different learning algorithms based on data from cortical recordings. The task is to predict the orientation of visual stimuli from the activity of a population of simultaneously recorded neurons. We compare several ways of improving the coding of the input (i.e., the spike data) as well as of the output (i.e., the orientation), and report the results obtained using different kernel algorithms.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sven Ove Hansson (1994). Kernel Contraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):845-859.
Christian Huyck & Ian Mitchell (2005). It is Not Evolution, but a Better Game Would Need a Better Agent. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):499-500.
Donald Ervin Knuth (2010). Selected Papers on Design of Algorithms. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Keith E. Yandell (1990). The Nature of Faith. Faith and Philosophy 7 (4):451-469.
Thomas Bartz-Beielstein (2008). How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo's Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing. Synthese 163 (3):385 - 396.
Joseph Ramsey & Clark Glymour, Experiments on the Accuracy of Algorithms for Inferring the Structure of Genetic Regulatory Networks From Microarray Expression Levels.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #164,752 of 1,911,320 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,535 of 1,911,320 )
How can I increase my downloads?