On the function of weak phantasmata in perception: Phenomenological, psychological and neurological clues for the transcendental function of imagination in perception
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2) (2005)
|Abstract||Weak phantasmata have a decisive and specifically transcendental function in our everyday perception. This paper provides several different arguments for this claim based on evidence from both empirical psychology and phenomenology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Donald Borrett, Sean D. Kelly & Hon Kwan (2000). Phenomenology, Dynamical Neural Networks and Brain Function. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):213-228.
Everett W. Hall (1959). The Adequacy of a Neurological Theory of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (September):75-84.
Aron Gurwitsch (1955). The Phenomenological and the Psychological Approach to Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (March):303-319.
Bence Nanay (2010). Perception and Imagination: Amodal Perception as Mental Imagery. Philosophical Studies.
Nigel J. T. Thomas, The Multidimensional Spectrum of Imagination: Images, Dreams, Hallucinations, and Active, Imaginative Perception.
Martin Davies (1983). Function in Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (December):409-426.
Joseph J. Kockelmans (1982). The Function of Psychology in Merleau-Ponty's Early Works. Rev Exist Psych Psychiat 18:119-142.
Lambert Wiesing (2011). Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Carolyn S. Price (1998). Function, Perception and Normal Causal Chains. Philosophical Studies 89 (1):31-51.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #56,103 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?