David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 9 (1-2):127-154 (1995)
Donald Green and Ian Shapiro argue that rational choice scholarship in political science is excessively theory?driven: too few of its theoretical insights have been subjected to serious empirical scrutiny and survived. But rational choice theorizing has the potential to identify and correct logical inconsistencies and slippages. It is thus valuable even if the resulting theories are not tested empirically. When Green and Shapiro's argument concerning collective dilemmas and free riding is formalized, it turns out to be deeply flawed and in many respects outright false. Their mistake is common enough: they misclassify a variety of collective dilemmas as prisoner's dilemmas. Because they misunderstand the theory of rational choice, Green and Shapiro allege that it is refuted by empirical findings that, in fact, support it.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey Friedman (1995). Economic Approaches to Politics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):1-24.
Daniel Diermeier (1995). Rational Choice and the Role of Theory in Political Science. Critical Review 9 (1-2):59-70.
Kenneth A. Shepsle (1995). Statistical Political Philosphy and Positive Political Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):213-222.
Morris P. Fiorina (1995). Rational Choice, Empirical Contributions, and the Scientific Enterprise. Critical Review 9 (1-2):85-94.
James Bernard Murphy (1995). Rational Choice Theory as Social Physics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):155-174.
Donald P. Green & Ian Shapiro (1995). Pathologies Revisited: Reflections on Our Critics. Critical Review 9 (1-2):235-276.
Andrew Hindmoor (1998). Ian Shapiro and Donald P. Green, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1994, Pp. Xi+ 239. [REVIEW] Utilitas 10 (3):370-.
Dennis Chong (1995). Rational Choice Theory's Mysterious Rivals. Critical Review 9 (1-2):37-57.
Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä (2004). A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied. Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
Michael Laver (1999). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications on Political Science, Donald P. Green and Ian Shapiro. Yale University Press, 1994, Xi + 239 Pages.The Rational Choice Controversy: Economic Models of Politics Reconsidered. Jeffrey Friedman (Ed). Yale University Press, 1996, Xi + 307 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 15 (01):136-.
Peter C. Ordeshook (1995). Engineering or Science: What is the Study of Politics? Critical Review 9 (1-2):175-188.
John Ferejohn & Debra Satz (1995). Unification, Universalism, and Rational Choice Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):71-84.
Yu-Shan Chen (2010). The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 93 (2):307 - 319.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Stanley Kelley (1995). The Promise and Limitations of Rational Choice Theory. Critical Review 9 (1-2):95-106.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads6 ( #217,583 of 1,139,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,139,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?