David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 21 (2):261-274 (2011)
It has been argued that ethically correct robots should be able to reason about right and wrong. In order to do so, they must have a set of do’s and don’ts at their disposal. However, such a list may be inconsistent, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory, depending on the reasoning principles that one employs. For this reason, it might be desirable if robots were to some extent able to reason about their own reasoning—in other words, if they had some meta-ethical capacities. In this paper, we sketch how one might go about designing robots that have such capacities. We show that the field of computational meta-ethics can profit from the same tools as have been used in computational metaphysics
|Keywords||Automated moral reasoning Computational meta-ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alan Ross Anderson (1967). Some Nasty Problems in the Formal Logic of Ethics. Noûs 1 (4):345-360.
Rudolf Carnap (1937). The Logical Syntax of Language. London, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd..
Hector-Neri Castañeda (1981). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in One Fell Swoop. In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic. 37--85.
Brian F. Chellas & Krister Segerberg (1996). Modal Logics in the Vicinity of S. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 37 (1):1-24.
Gert-Jan Lokhorst, Mally's Deontic Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Citations of this work BETA
Amnon Eden (2011). Some Philosophical Issues in Computer Science. Minds and Machines 21 (2):123-133.
Similar books and articles
Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2011). Erratum To: Computational Meta-Ethics. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 21 (3):475-475.
Abraham Rudnick (2001). A Meta-Ethical Critique of Care Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):505-517.
Michael Gill (2009). Indeterminacy and Variability in Meta-Ethics. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):215 - 234.
Bert Gordijn Rob de Vries (2009). Empirical Ethics and its Alleged Meta-Ethical Fallacies. Bioethics 23 (4):193-201.
Peter Van Inwagen (1998). Meta-Ontology. Erkenntnis 48 (2/3):233 - 250.
Steven Ross (2008). Meta-Ethics and Justification. Acta Analytica 23 (2):91-114.
Maurilio Lovatti (2007). Meta-Ethics and Analysis of Language From Wittgenstein to Deontic Logic Systems. Analysis and Metaphysics 6:120-135.
Daniel Whiting (2007). Defending Semantic Generalism. Analysis 67 (296):303–311.
Phil Corkum (2012). Meta-Conceivability. Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):12.
Folke Tersman (2014). Disagreement: Ethics and Elsewhere. Erkenntnis 79 (1):55-72.
James Dreier (2004). Meta‐Ethics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):23–44.
Daniel M. Goldstein (2003). Reproductive Technologies of the Self: Michel Foucault and Meta-Narrative-Ethics. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):229-240.
Gerhard Brewka (2001). Representing Meta-Knowledge in Poole-Systems. Studia Logica 67 (2):153-165.
Stuart S. Glennan (1995). Computationalism and the Problem of Other Minds. Philosophical Psychology 8 (4):375-88.
Added to index2011-02-07
Total downloads45 ( #41,469 of 1,139,990 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #18,341 of 1,139,990 )
How can I increase my downloads?