Synchrnoic consciousness from a neurological point of view: The philosophical foundations for neuroethics
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 162 (3):439 - 450 (2008)
Daniel Kolak’s theory of synchronic consciousness according to which the entire range of dissociative phenomena, from pathologies such as MPD and schizophrenia to normal dream states, are best explained in terms of consciousness becoming simultaneously identified as many selves, has revolutionary therapeutic implications for neurology and psychiatry. All these selves, according to Kolak—even the purely imaginary ones that exist as such only in our dreams—are not just conscious but also self-conscious, with beliefs, intentions, living lives informed by memories (confabulatory, in the case of the fictional ones) and personal histories. Kolak’s derivation of psychiatrically relevant aspects of his theory—a neurological rendition of a Kantian transcendental argument—can be given a straightforward neurological, and therefore open to scientific scrutiny, interpretation that would then more easily lend itself to the clinical setting in which these perplexing phenomena, along with their purveyors, must live and cope. This will be the main focus of this paper.
|Keywords||Consciousness Neurology Psychiatry Dissociation Personal identity The subject Phenomenology Neuroscience Kolak Freud Autism Aspergers Schizophrenia Stem cells Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) GABA Neural Darwinism Korsakoff’s Entanglement Cognitive dynamics Apoptosis Identification disorder syndrome (IDS) Fact of exclusive conjoinment (FEC) Neuropsychopharmacology Synchronic consciousness Neuroethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel Kolak (1993). Finding Our Selves: Identification, Identity, and Multiple Personality. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):363-86.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Papineau (2003). Theories of Consciousness. In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press 353.
P. W. Schoenle & K. Schmeider (2001). Consciousness: A Neurological Perspective. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press
Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Michelle Windt (2007). Dreams. In D. Barrett & P. McNamara (eds.), The New Science of Dreaming. Praeger Publishers
Shaun Gallagher (2000). Philosophical Conceptions of the Self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (1):14-21.
Gal Yehezkel (2008). Self-Consciousness, Objectivity, and Time. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):591-611.
Fabrice Clément & Abraham J. Malerstein (2003). What is It Like to Be Conscious? The Ontogenesis of Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):67 – 85.
Benjamin Naneix (2008). The Failure of the “Localisationist Project” in Mental Medicine in Nineteenth Century France and the Emergence of the Neurological Clinic. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):57-63.
F. Clement & Abraham J. Malerstein (2003). What is It Like to Be Conscious? The Ontogenesis of Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):67-85.
Joseph J. Fins & F. Plum (2004). Neurological Diagnosis is More Than a State of Mind: Diagnostic Clarity and Impaired Consciousness. Archives of Neurology 61 (9):1354-1355.
Eran Klein (2011). Is There a Need for Clinical Neuroskepticism? Neuroethics 4 (3):251-259.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #141,475 of 1,699,548 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #62,577 of 1,699,548 )
How can I increase my downloads?