Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):365-372 (1994)
|Abstract||The Doctrine of Temporal Parts (sometimes abbreviated herein as 'DTP') asserts that, for each portion (including infinitely small portions) of the smallest period of time during which a material object exists, there is an object-a temporal part of the material object in question-which exists at that and at no other time. In "Things Change," Mark Heller offers an argument for DTP, and responds to a objection, the "No-Change" objection, to that doctrine.2 My goal in this paper is to undermine both Heller's argument in favor of DTP and his response to that criticism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Thomas Sattig (2002). Temporal Parts and Complex Predicates. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (3):279–286.
Philippe Chuard (2011). Temporal Experiences and Their Parts. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (11).
Eric T. Olson (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood. Noûs 40 (4):738–752.
T. Sattig (2003). Temporal Predication with Temporal Parts and Temporal Counterparts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):355 – 368.
Eric T. Olson (2006). Temporal Parts and Timeless Parthood. Noûs 40 (4):738-752.
Lawrence Brian Lombard (1999). On the Alleged Incompatibility of Presentism and Temporal Parts. Philosophia 27 (1-2):253-260.
Jack Copeland, Heather Dyke & Diane Proudfoot (2001). Temporal Parts and Their Individuation. Analysis 61 (4):289–293.
Berit Brogaard (2000). Presentist Four-Dimensionalism. The Monist 83 (3):341-356.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,391 of 740,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?