Croatian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):21-34 (2009)
|Abstract||Michael Devitt has argued that Chomsky, along with many other Linguists and philosophers, is ignorant of the true nature of Generative Linguistics. In particular, Devitt argues that Chomsky and others wrongly believe the proper object of linguistic inquiry to be speakers' competences, rather than the languages that speakers are competent with. In return, some commentators on Devitt's work have returned the accusation, arguing that it is Devitt who is ignorant about Linguistics. In this note, I consider whether there might be less to this apparent dispute than meets the eye.|
|Keywords||linguistics Chomsky Devitt language syntax psychological reality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Guy Longworth (2009). Ignorance of Linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):21-34.
Barry C. Smith (2006). Why We Still Need Knowledge of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (18):431-457.
Michael Devitt (2006). Ignorance of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
M. J. Cain (2010). Linguistics, Psychology and the Scientific Study of Language. Dialectica 64 (3):385-404.
Peter Slezak (2009). Linguistic Explanation and ‘Psychological Reality’. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):3-20.
Michael Devitt (2008). Explanation and Reality in Linguistics. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):203-231.
Michael Devitt (2009). Psychological Conception, Psychological Reality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):35-44.
Gergo Somodi (2009). Ignorance Radicalized. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):140-156.
Added to index2009-09-03
Total downloads138 ( #4,019 of 722,764 )
Recent downloads (6 months)33 ( #3,544 of 722,764 )
How can I increase my downloads?