Norms and naturalism: Comments on Miriam Solomon's social empiricism

Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 241-245 (2008)
Miriam Solomon's social empiricism is marked by emphasis on community level rationality in science and the refusal to impose a distinction between the epistemic and the non-epistemic character of factors ("decision vectors") that incline scientists for or against a theory. While she attempts to derive some norms from the analysis of cases, her insistent naturalism undermines her effort to articulate norms for the (appropriate) distribution of decision vectors.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2008.16.3.241
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
José Antonio López Cerezo (2015). Social Objectivity Under Scrutiny in the Pasteur–Pouchet Debate. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (2):301-318.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

49 ( #97,642 of 1,932,453 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #456,120 of 1,932,453 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.