David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):151-167 (2010)
This paper suggests that art cannot be defined in terms of individually necessary and jointly sufficient conditions. Instead, we propose that there are several sufficient conditions for something's being art, and that a successful definition will consist of a disjunction of minimally sufficient conditions. Our proposal owes much to the insights of Berys Gaut's ‘"Art" as a Cluster Concept’ but offers a much simpler logical formulation, which, in addition, is immune to the objections that have been raised to Gaut's account. This paper agrees with Gaut's claim that there are borderline cases of art, and suggests that they arise from indeterminacy about the content of some of the minimally sufficient conditions. It is argued that this disjunctive account is superior to classical theories, resemblance-to-paradigm theories, and prototype theories of art
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Annelies Monseré (forthcoming). Borderline Cases and the Project of Defining Art. Acta Analytica:1-17.
Brian R. Glenney (2013). Philosophical Problems, Cluster Concepts, and the Many Lives of Molyneux's Question. Biology and Philosophy 28 (3):541-558.
Similar books and articles
K. Stock (2000). Some Objections to Stecker's Historical Functionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):479-491.
Derek Matravers (2007). Institutional Definitions and Reasons. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):251-257.
Steven French (2003). A Model‐Theoretic Account of Representation (or, I Don't Know Much About Art…but I Know It Involves Isomorphism). Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
A. Neill & A. Ridley (2012). Relational Theories of Art: The History of an Error. British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2):141-151.
Berys Gaut (2005). The Cluster Account of Art Defended. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):273-288.
Stephen Davies (2004). The Cluster Theory of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):297-300.
Aaron Meskin (2007). The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):388-400.
Thomas Adajian (2003). On the Cluster Account of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
Added to index2010-04-10
Total downloads64 ( #56,874 of 1,781,221 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #123,275 of 1,781,221 )
How can I increase my downloads?