David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:333 - 340 (1992)
Using the author's social analysis of scientific knowledge, two ways of understanding the importance of gender to the philosophy of science are offered. Given a requirement of openness to multiple critical perspectives, the gender, race and class structure of a scientific community are an important ingredient of its epistemic reliability. Secondly, one can ask whether a gender sensitive scientific community might prefer certain evaluative criteria (or virtues of theory or practice) to others. Six such criteria (several of which are at odds with criteria accepted in mainstream science) are discussed. Their articulation prompts a series of philosophical questions, the answering of which would constitute one program (or more) of a gender sensitive philosophy of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (1994). Feminist Values and Cognitive Virtues. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:120 - 129.
Kristina Rolin (2004). Why Gender is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Kristina Rolin (2004). Why Gender Is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Jane Roland Martin (1989). Ideological Critiques and the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 56 (1):1-22.
Evelyn Fox Keller (1987). The Gender/Science System: Or, Is Sex to Gender as Nature Is to Science? Hypatia 2 (3):37 - 49.
Katrin Nikoleyczik (2012). Towards Diffractive Transdisciplinarity: Integrating Gender Knowledge Into the Practice of Neuroscientific Research. Neuroethics 5 (3):231-245.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Daniel Hicks (2012). Scientific Practices and Their Social Context. Dissertation, U. of Notre Dame
Julie A. Nelson (1992). Thinking About Gender. Hypatia 7 (3):138 - 154.
Ann E. Cudd (1998). Multiculturalism as a Cognitive Virtue of Scientific Practice. Hypatia 13 (3):43 - 61.
Elizabeth Potter (1995). Good Science and Good Philosophy of Science. Synthese 104 (3):423 - 439.
Lisa Heldke (2006). “Dear Kate Bornstein”. Radical Philosophy Today 3:101-109.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads27 ( #63,981 of 1,100,975 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #34,379 of 1,100,975 )
How can I increase my downloads?