The Planning Theory of Law
Res Publica 18 (2):201-206 (2012)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Matthew H. Kramer (forthcoming). In Defense of Hart. Legal Theory.
Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (2009). From Shared Agency to the Normativity of Law: Shapiro's and Coleman's Defence of Hart's Practice Theory of Rules Reconsidered. Law and Philosophy 28 (1):59 - 100.
Chrisoula Andreou (2004). Instrumentally Rational Myopic Planning. Philosophical Papers 33 (2):133-145.
David Plunkett (2013). The Planning Theory of Law I: The Nature of Legal Institutions1. Philosophy Compass 8 (2):149-158.
David Plunkett (2013). The Planning Theory of Law II: The Nature of Legal Norms. Philosophy Compass 8 (2):159-169.
Kathryn E. Sanders (2001). CHIRON: Planning in an Open-Textured Domain. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (4).
Matthew R. Longo & Bennett I. Bertenthal (2004). Automaticity and Inhibition in Action Planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):44-45.
John Threlfall (2005). The Formative Use of Assessment Information in Planning: The Notion of Contingent Planning. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (1):54 - 65.
W. Thomas Berriman (1980). Health Planning and the Law: An Update on the Statute. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 8 (3):10-12.
David A. Rosenbaum (2001). Computational Motor Planning and the Theory of Event Coding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903.
Marta Olivetti Belardinelli & Demis Basso (2001). The Role of Feedforward Control in Motor Planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):896-897.
Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget (2004). Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
B. S. Hale & L. Hale (2010). Respecting Autonomy in Population Policy: An Argument for International Family Planning Programs. Public Health Ethics 3 (2):157-166.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-10-15Total downloads18 ( #67,643 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |

