David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):439-453 (2000)
Representational theories of mind cannot individuate the sense modalities in a principled manner. According to representationalism, the phenomenal character of experiences is determined by their contents. The usual objection is that inverted qualia are possible, so the phenomenal character of experiences may vary independently of their contents. But the objection is inconclusive. It raises difficult questions about the metaphysics of secondary qualities and it is difficult to see whether or not inverted qualia are possible. This paper proposes an alternative test of representationalism. Do experiences in different sense modalities have the same phenomenal character when they share content? Psychological work on the perception of shape through vision and spatial hearing is discussed. This work shows that visual and auditory experiences differ in phenomenal character even in so far as they represent similar properties. This objection to representationalism does not invite questions about secondary qualities or depend on establishing metaphysical possibilities
|Keywords||Metaphysics Mind Psychology Representation Dretske, F|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Matthew Ratcliffe (2012). What is Touch? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
John Dilworth (2005). The Double Content of Perception. Synthese 146 (3):225-243.
P. Ross (2001). Qualia and the Senses. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):495-511.
Jennifer Church (2010). Seeing Reasons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):638-670.
Peter W. Ross (2001). Qualia and the Senses. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):495-511.
Similar books and articles
René Jagnow (2009). How Representationalism Can Account for the Phenomenal Significance of Illumination. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):551-572.
René Jagnow (2012). Representationalism and the Perspectival Character of Perceptual Experience. Philosophical Studies 157 (2):227-249.
James John (2010). Against Qualia Theory. Philosophical Studies 147 (3):323 - 346.
Paul Coates (2009). The Multiple Contents of Experience. Philosophical Topics 37 (1):25-47.
René Jagnow (2011). Ambiguous Figures and the Spatial Contents of Perceptual Experience: A Defense of Representationalism. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (3):325-346.
Fiona Macpherson (2000). Representational Theories of Phenomenal Character. Dissertation, University of Stirling
Uriah Kriegel (2002). PANIC Theory and the Prospects for a Representational Theory of Phenomenal Consciousness. Philosophical Psychology 15 (1):55-64.
Michael Tye (2002). Representationalism and the Transparency of Experience. Noûs 36 (1):137-51.
Dominic M. Mciver Lopes (2000). What Is It Like to See with Your Ears? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):439-453.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #70,606 of 1,902,204 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #135,281 of 1,902,204 )
How can I increase my downloads?