David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1085 - 1106 (2011)
This paper examines Spinoza's remarks on women in the Political Treatise in the context of his views in the Ethics about human community and similitude. Although these remarks appear to exclude women from democratic participation on the basis of essential incapacities, I aim to show that Spinoza intended these remarks not as true statements, but as prompts for critical consideration of the place of women in the progressive democratic polity. In common with other scholars, I argue that women, in Spinoza's system, are deprived of freedom and political participation not by their essential natures, but by their social and historical circumstances. I differ from other scholars, however, in basing this conclusion on the different critical functions of the Political Treatise and the Ethics. Following that critical comparison, I consider Spinoza's views on the `natural right' of women and their equal capacity for political participation in terms of his arguments for the compositional similarity of men and women. Finally, I argue that Spinoza offers an explanation for women's actual disempowerment through his account of economic dependence within marriage
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Christine Battersby (1998). The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity. Routledge.
Gilles Deleuze (1988). Spinoza, Practical Philosophy. City Lights Books.
Moira Gatens (ed.) (2009). Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). The Metaphysics of Spinoza's Theological Political Treatise. In Yitzhak Melamed (ed.), Spinoza's Theological Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge.
M. Ennaji (2010). Multiculturalism, Gender and Political Participation in Morocco. Diogenes 57 (1):46-57.
James S. Preus (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.
Holloway Sparks (1997). Dissident Citizenship: Democratic Theory, Political Courage, and Activist Women. Hypatia 12 (4):74-110.
Tammy Nyden (1999). Radical Cartesian Politics: Van Velthuysen, De la Court, and Spinoza. Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 15:35-65.
Don Garrett (2010). Promising' Ideas: Hobbes and Contract in Spinoza's Political Philosophy. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. 192.
Marilyn Friedman (2007). Female Terrorists. Social Philosophy Today 23:189-200.
Amanda R. Clarke (2011). Beyond Reproduction: Women's Health, Activism, and Public Policy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):159-164.
Deborah Boyle (2013). Margaret Cavendish on Gender, Nature, and Freedom. Hypatia 28 (3):516-532.
Sherilyn MacGregor (2004). From Care to Citizenship: Calling Ecofeminism Back to Politics. Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):56-84.
Added to index2011-12-16
Total downloads11 ( #113,039 of 1,089,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?