Topoi 26 (1):133-149 (2007)
|Abstract||We develop a conceptual and formal clarification of notion of surprise as a belief-based phenomenon by exploring a rich typology. Each kind of surprise is associated with a particular phase of cognitive processing and involves particular kinds of epistemic representations (representations and expectations under scrutiny, implicit beliefs, presuppositions). We define two main kinds of surprise: mismatch-based surprise and astonishment. In the central part of the paper we suggest how a formal model of surprise can be integrated with a formal model of belief change. We investigate the role of surprise in triggering the process of belief reconsideration. There are a number of models of surprise developed in the psychology of emotion. We provide several comparisons of our approach with those models.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ken Levy (2009). The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Daniel C. Dennett (2001). Surprise, Surprise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):982-982.
Michael Winterbottom (1974). Surprise, Surprise Gianna Petrone: La Battuta a Sorpresa Negli Oratori Latini. Pp. 129. Palermo: Palumbo, 1971. Paper, L. 1,800. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (02):218-219.
J. V. Howard (2009). Significance Testing with No Alternative Hypothesis: A Measure of Surprise. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 70 (2):253 - 270.
Elliott Sober (1998). To Give a Surprise Exam, Use Game Theory. Synthese 115 (3):355-373.
Roberto Casati & Elena Pasquinelli (2007). How Can You Be Surprised? The Case for Volatile Expectations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1-2):171-183.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,206 of 722,787 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,644 of 722,787 )
How can I increase my downloads?