Hart's Critics On Defeasible Concepts and Ascriptivism

Hart's "Ascription of Responsibility and Rights" is where we find perhaps the first clear pronouncement of defeasibility and the technical introduction of the term. The paper has been criticised, disavowed, and never quite fully redeemed. Its lurid history is now being used as an excuse for dismissing the importance of defeasibility
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Douglas Walton (2010). Similarity, Precedent and Argument From Analogy. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):217-246.
    Similar books and articles
    John Gardner (2008). Hart and Feinberg on Responsibility. In Matthew H. Kramer (ed.), The Legacy of H. Oxford University Press.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    8 ( #138,555 of 1,088,623 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,623 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.