David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Developing World Bioethics 6 (1):13-22 (2006)
ABSTRACTThe principle of informed refusal poses a specific problem when it is invoked by a pregnant woman who, in spite of having accepted her pregnancy, refuses the diagnostic and/or therapeutic measures that would ensure the well‐being of her endangered fetus. Guidelines issued by professional bodies in the developed world are conflicting: either they allow autonomy and informed consent to be overruled to the benefit of the fetus, or they recommend the full respect of these principles. A number of medical ethicists advocate the overruling of alleged irrational or unreasonable refusal for the benefit of the fetus. The present essay supports the view of fetal rights to health and to life based on the principle that an ‘accepted’ fetus is a ‘third person’. In developing countries, however, the implementation of the latter principle is likely to be in conflict with a ‘communitarian’ perception of the individual – in this case, the pregnant woman. Within the scope of the limitations to the right to autonomy of J.S. Mill's ‘harm principle’, the South African Patients’ Charter makes provision for informed refusal. The fact that, in practice, it is not implemented illustrates the well‐known difficulty of applying Western bioethical principles in real life in the developing world
|Keywords||rights informed refusal duties informed consent|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Louis-jacquesvan Bogaert (2006). Rights of and Duties to Non-Consenting Patients – Informed Refusal in the Developing World. Developing World Bioethics 6 (1):13–22.
Michael J. Meyer (1992). Patients' Duties. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):541-555.
Louis–Jaqcues van Bogaert (2002). The Limits of Conscientious Objection to Abortion in the Developing World. Developing World Bioethics 2 (2):131–143.
Emma Verástegui (2006). Consenting of the Vulnerable: The Informed Consent Procedure in Advanced Cancer Patients in Mexico. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-12.
Muhammad M. Hammami, Hunaida M. Abdulhameed, Kristine A. Concepcion, Abdullah Eissa, Sumaya Hammami, Hala Amer, Abdelraheem Ahmed & Eman Al-Gaai (2012). Consenting Options for Posthumous Organ Donation: Presumed Consent and Incentives Are Not Favored. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):32-.
Charles G. Ngwena & Rebecca J. Cook Guest Editors (2008). Hiv/Aids, Pregnancy and Reproductive Autonomy: Rights and Duties. Developing World Bioethics 8 (1):iii–vi.
Javier Hidalgo (2012). Why Restrictions on the Immigration of Health Workers Are Unjust. Developing World Bioethics 12 (3):117-126.
Cheryl Coxmacpherson (2004). Research Sponsors Duties to Developing World Host Nations: The Ongoing Wma Discussion of Possible Revisions to the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki (Paragraph 30). [REVIEW] Developing World Bioethics 4 (2):173–175.
Adnan A. Hyder & Salman A. Wali (2006). Informed Consent and Collaborative Research: Perspectives From the Developing World. Developing World Bioethics 6 (1):33–40.
Cheryl Cox Macpherson (2004). Research Sponsors Duties to Developing World Host Nations: The Ongoing Wma Discussion of Possible Revisions to the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki (Paragraph 30). [REVIEW] Developing World Bioethics 4 (2):173-175.
Louis-Jacques van Bogaert (2002). Comments on the Thandi Case. Developing World Bioethics 2 (1):88–91.
Dale Jamieson (2005). Duties to the Distant: Aid, Assistance, and Intervention in the Developing World. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):151 - 170.
Hugh V. McLachlan (2010). Moral Rights to Life, Both Natural and Non-Natural: Reflections on James Griffin's Account of Human Rights. Diametros 26:58-76.
Ivar Kolstad (2012). Human Rights and Positive Corporate Duties: The Importance of Corporate–State Interaction. Business Ethics 21 (3):276-285.
David M. Douglas (2011). A Bundle of Software Rights and Duties. Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):185-197.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #281,042 of 1,413,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,345 of 1,413,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?