Graduate studies at Western
Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):347-350 (1998)
|Abstract||This paper offers a definition of quality for products, explains why engineers are morally responsible for quality, and outlines how engineers can fulfill this responsibility.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Céline Kermisch (2012). Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
Peter Kok, Ton van der Wiele, Richard McKenna & Alan Brown (2001). A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit Within a Quality Management Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):285 - 297.
Willem Bakker & Michael C. Loui (1997). Can Designing and Selling Low-Quality Products Be Ethical? Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2).
Vassilios N. Kazakidis & Rachel F. C. Haliburton (1998). The Mining Engineer, Moral Luck, and Professional Accountability. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (4):437-456.
P. Aarne Vesilind (2002). Vestal Virgins and Engineering Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 7 (1):92-101.
Steven P. Nichols (1997). Professional Responsibility: The Role of the Engineer in Society. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):327-337.
Juan José Tarí (2011). Research Into Quality Management and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):623-638.
John Forge (2004). The Morality of Weapons Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (3):531-542.
Michael Davis (2012). “Ain't No One Here But Us Social Forces”: Constructing the Professional Responsibility of Engineers. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):13-34.
Ton van der Wiele, Peter Kok, Richard McKenna & Alan Brown (2001). A Corporate Social Responsibility Audit Within a Quality Management Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):285 - 297.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #246,970 of 740,068 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?