The Utility of Religious Illusion: A Critique of J.S. Mill's Religion of Humanity

Utilitas 12 (2):137 (2000)
In, Mill argues that a wholly naturalistic religion of humanity would promote individual and social welfare better than supernatural religions like Christianity; in, however, Mill defends the salutary effects of hope in an afterlife. While commentators have acknowledged this discrepancy, they have not examined the utilitarian value of what Mill terms. In this essay, I explain Mill's case against the utility of supernatural religious belief and then argue that Mill cannot dismiss the utility of hope in an ultimate justice since it need not pervert the intellect or morality. There are thus utilitarian grounds to support some supernatural illusions, which undermines Mill's defence of an exclusively naturalistic religion. I conclude with the suggestion that while the utility of religious belief leads Mill toward William James's view, they disagree about whether supernatural religious sentiment has any unique, intrinsic force
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800002752
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Chin-Liew Ten (2002). Was Mill a Liberal? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
José L. Tasset (2007). Hume and Mill on 'Utility of Religion': A Borgean Garden of Forking Paths? Τέλος. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 14 (2):117-129.
Marvin Kohl (1987). Russell on the Utility of Religion: Copleston's Critique. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22 (1/2):69 - 79.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

30 ( #158,693 of 1,932,452 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #94,263 of 1,932,452 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.