David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 12 (2):137 (2000)
In, Mill argues that a wholly naturalistic religion of humanity would promote individual and social welfare better than supernatural religions like Christianity; in, however, Mill defends the salutary effects of hope in an afterlife. While commentators have acknowledged this discrepancy, they have not examined the utilitarian value of what Mill terms. In this essay, I explain Mill's case against the utility of supernatural religious belief and then argue that Mill cannot dismiss the utility of hope in an ultimate justice since it need not pervert the intellect or morality. There are thus utilitarian grounds to support some supernatural illusions, which undermines Mill's defence of an exclusively naturalistic religion. I conclude with the suggestion that while the utility of religious belief leads Mill toward William James's view, they disagree about whether supernatural religious sentiment has any unique, intrinsic force
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Colin Heydt (2006). Narrative, Imagination, and the Religion of Humanity in Mill's Ethics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):99-115.
Chin-Liew Ten (2002). Was Mill a Liberal? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
B. S. Rennie (1995). The Religious Creativity of Modern Humanity: Some Observations on Eliade's Unfinished Thought. Religious Studies 31 (2):221 - 235.
José L. Tasset (2007). Hume and Mill on 'Utility of Religion': A Borgean Garden of Forking Paths? Τέλος. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 14 (2):117-129.
Dale E. Miller (2004). On Millgram on Mill. Utilitas 16 (1):96-108.
Ninian Smart (1963). Social Anthropology and the Philosophy of Religion. Inquiry 6 (1-4):287-299.
John Stuart Mill (1874). Three Essays on Religion. New York,Ams Press.
Friedrich Hügel (1921). Essays & Addresses on the Philosophy of Religion. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.
John Stuart Mill (1958). Nature, and Utility of Religion. New York, Liberal Arts Press.
Marvin Kohl (1987). Russell on the Utility of Religion: Copleston's Critique. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 22 (1/2):69 - 79.
James William Jones (2002). Terror and Transformation: The Ambiguity of Religion in Psychoanalytic Perspective. Brunner-Routledge.
Mozaffar Qizilbash (2006). Capability, Happiness and Adaptation in Sen and J. S. Mill. Utilitas 18 (1):20-32.
D. G. Brown (2012). Mill's Justice and Political Liberalism. In Leonard Kahn (ed.), Mill on Justice. Palgrave Macmillan 135.
John Stuart Mill (1961). The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Ethical, Political, and Religious. New York, Modern Library.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads20 ( #205,589 of 2,159,646 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #125,144 of 2,159,646 )
How can I increase my downloads?