David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer 175--185 (2012)
John Norton’s argument that all formal theories of induction fail raises substantive questions about the philosophical analysis of scientific reasoning. What are the criteria of adequacy for philosophical theories of induction, explanation, or theory structure? Is more than one adequate theory possible? Using a generalized version of Norton’s argument, I demonstrate that the competition between formal and material theories in philosophy of science results from adhering to different criteria of adequacy. This situation encourages an interpretation of “formal” and “material” as indicators of divergent criteria that accompany different philosophical methodologies. I characterize another criterion of adequacy associated with material theories, the avoidance of imported problems, and conclude that one way to negotiate between conflicting criteria is to adopt a pluralist stance toward philosophical theories of scientific reasoning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrea I. Woody (2015). Re-Orienting Discussions of Scientific Explanation: A Functional Perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:79-87.
Alan C. Love (2015). Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles, and Scientific Explaining in Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 52:88-94.
Similar books and articles
E. C. Barnes (2002). The Miraculous Choice Argument for Realism. Philosophical Studies 111 (2):97 - 120.
James F. Childress (1977). The Identification of Ethical Principles. Journal of Religious Ethics 5 (1):39 - 66.
Brent Mundy (1989). On Quantitative Relationist Theories. Philosophy of Science 56 (4):582-600.
James T. Cushing (1990/2005). Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix. Cambridge University Press.
Hans Halvorson (2012). What Scientific Theories Could Not Be. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Ann E. Cudd (2005). How to Explain Oppression: Criteria of Adequacy for Normative Explanatory Theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):20-49.
John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Theories and Theories of Truth. Metaphysica 12 (1):31-43.
Ingo Brigandt (2010). Scientific Reasoning Is Material Inference: Combining Confirmation, Discovery, and Explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):31-43.
Added to index2010-03-30
Total downloads27 ( #140,679 of 1,792,085 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #344,915 of 1,792,085 )
How can I increase my downloads?