David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bloomsbury Academic (2013)
For nearly two millennia, theistic philosophers have had to contend with problems raised against their theistic beliefs. Typically raised by nontheistic (atheistic and agnostic) philosophers, these problems have ranged from critiques of theistic philosophers’ arguments for God’s existence to arguments for the nonexistence of God. In this book, I present a new set of problems for theistic philosophers’ theistic beliefs. The problems pertain specifically to three types of theistic philosopher, to be referred to here as “theistic inferentialists,” “theistic noninferentialists,” and “theistic fideists” (to be defined shortly). Each type of theistic philosopher faces a problem unique to his or her type, and they all share two problems, or so I shall argue. In some cases, the problems raised here take us down an entirely new discursive path; in others, they take us down a new discursive path branching off from an old discursive path. In every case, however, they are paths that take us farther and farther away from theism.
|Keywords||theistic inferentialists theistic noninferentialists theistic fideists evidence theism atheism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rob Lovering (2010). The Problem of the Theistic Evidentialist Philosophers. Philo 13 (2):185-200.
Bryan Frances (2008). Spirituality, Expertise, and Philosophers. In Jon Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford 44-81.
Timothy Chappell (2011). Theism in Historical Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.
Robert Oakes (1986). Theistic Orthodoxy, Theistic Consubstantialism, and Theistic Internalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (3):177 - 189.
Richard Otte (1987). A Theistic Conception of Probability. Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):427-447.
Don Fawkes & Tom Smythe (1996). Simplicity and Theology. Religious Studies 32 (2):259 - 270.
Graham Oppy (1993). Modal Theistic Arguments. Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Luke Gelinas (2009). The Problem of Natural Evil I: General Theistic Replies. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):533-559.
Mark T. Nelson (1996). Who Are the Best Judges of Theistic Arguments? Sophia 35 (2):1-12.
Stephen T. Davis (1997). God, Reason and Theistic Proof. Edinburgh University Press.
Daniel A. Dombrowski (2006). Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press.
Joshua Rasmussen (2009). From a Necessary Being to God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):1 - 13.
Stephen J. Sullivan (1993). Robert Adams's Theistic Argument From the Nature of Morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 21 (2):303 - 312.
Edward Henderson (1982). A Critique of Religious Reductionism. Philosophy Research Archives 8:429-456.
Added to index2012-11-05
Total downloads20 ( #197,331 of 1,934,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,826 of 1,934,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?