David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 63 (4):433 - 458 (1999)
Philosophical relativism, which denies objectivity and undermines causality, has been a constant feature of ideological struggle in this century, especially in mystifying science and undercutting belief in social progress through scientific understanding. Surprisingly, while the relativist attack has been led by culture critics, they have been able to claim support from the writings of some of the leading scientists themselves, especially in quantum theory. While current quantum theory yields a highly accurate representation of reality, it has been interpreted to deny objectivity and causality. Einstein fought throughout his life against these relativist interpretations, associated especially with the views of Bohr and Heisenberg. It is only in the last few years that Einstein has been largely vindicated by new experimental and theoretical developments, and by a fuller understanding of how the Copenhagen interpretation of Bohr came to dominate the conventional wisdom.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Honner (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press.
Paul M. Clark (ed.) (1981). Modern Physics and Problems of Knowledge. Open University Press.
David Bohm (1957). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
H. E. Longino (1983). Scientific Objectivity and the Logics of Science. Inquiry 26 (1):85 – 106.
Ingeborg Strohmeyer (1987). Tragweite Und Grenze der Transzendentalphilosophie Zur Grundlegung der Quantenphysik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18 (1-2):239-275.
Alisa Bokulich (2008). Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
Michael Redhead (1995). From Physics to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Railton (1984). Marx and the Objectivity of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:813 - 826.
C. A. Hooker (1991). Projection, Physical Intelligibility, Objectivity and Completeness: The Divergent Ideals of Bohr and Einstein. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):491-511.
Michel Bitbol, Pierre Kerszberg & Jean Petitot, Constituting Objectivity. Transcendental Perspectives on Modern Physics.
Jon Williamson (2006). Dispositional Versus Epistemic Causality. Minds and Machines 16 (3):259-276.
Nancy Cartwright (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #644,033 of 1,934,701 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,264 of 1,934,701 )
How can I increase my downloads?