On what God would do

Many debates in the philosophy of religion, particularly arguments for and against the existence of God, depend on a claim or set of claims about what God—qua sovereign, omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good being— would do , either directly or indirectly, in particular cases or in general. Accordingly, before these debates can be resolved we must first settle the more fundamental issue of whether we can know, or at least have justified belief about, what God would do. In this paper, I lay out the possible positions on the issue of whether we can know what God would do, positions I refer to as Broad Skeptical Theism, Broad Epistemic Theism, and Narrow Skeptical Theism. I then examine the implications of each of these views and argue that each presents serious problems for theism.
Keywords God  Skeptical theism  Evidential argument from evil  Broad Skeptical Theism  Broad Epistemic Theism  Narrow Skeptical Theism  Intrinsic dependence  Extrinsic dependence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/40270270
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Rob Lovering, On what God would do
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Michael J. Murray (2002). Deus absconditus. In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge University Press 63.
William P. Alston (2004). Religious Experience Justifies Religious Belief. In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub. 135--45.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Danaher (2014). Skeptical Theism and Divine Permission - A Reply to Anderson. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):101-118.
Ryan Rhodes (2015). Taking the Narrow Way: Lovering, Evil, and Knowing What God Would Do. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (1):25-35.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

117 ( #24,054 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

28 ( #34,733 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.