`Representative ideas' in Malebranche and Arnauld
Mind 32 (128):449-461 (1923)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSteven M. Nadler (2000). Deux Cartesiens: La Polemique Arnauld Malebranche (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (4):595-597.
Nancy Kendrick (2002). "Presence" and "Likeness" in Arnauld's Critique of Malebranche. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):(2002), 205–212.
Andrew Pyle (2003). Malebranche. Routledge.
Monte Cook (1991). Malebranche Versus Arnauld. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):183-199.
Steven M. Nadler (ed.) (2000). The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press.
Steven M. Nadler (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford University Press.
John N. Martin (2011). Existential Import in Cartesian Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (3):211-239.
Russell Wahl (1988). The Arnauld-Malebranche Controversy and Descartes' Ideas. The Monist 71 (4):560-572.
Steven Nadler (2008). Arnauld's God. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 517-538.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads6 ( #145,458 of 548,999 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,999 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
