How Are Ordinary Objects Possible?
The Monist 88 (4):510-533 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJiri Benovsky (2008). There Are Vague Objects (in Any Sense in Which There Are Ordinary Objects). Studia Philosophica Estonica 1:1-4.
Jonathan Schaffer (2009). The Deflationary Metaontology of Thomasson's Ordinary Objects. Philosophical Books 50 (3):142-157.
Amie L. Thomasson (2010). The Controversy Over the Existence of Ordinary Objects. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):591-601.
Ben Caplan & Bob Bright (2005). Fusions and Ordinary Physical Objects. Philosophical Studies 125 (1):61-83.
Daniel Z. Korman (2007). The Naive Conception of Material Objects: A Defense. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin
Edward N. Zalta (2006). Essence and Modality. Mind 115 (459):659-693.
Daniel Z. Korman (forthcoming). Ordinary Objects. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Andrew Melnyk (1995). Physicalism, Ordinary Objects, and Identity. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:221-235.
Michael Ayers (2005). Ordinary Objects, Ordinary Language, and Identity. The Monist 88 (4):534-570.
Bryan Pickel (2010). There is No 'Is' of Constitution. Philosophical Studies 147 (2).
Philip Richard Sullivan (2009). Objects Limit Human Comprehension. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):65-79.
By Amie L. Thomasson (2006). Metaphysical Arguments Against Ordinary Objects. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):340–359.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads16 ( #74,686 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
