How real is substantial change?
The Monist 89 (3):275-293 (2006)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur (2002). Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness. Consciousness And Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
E. J. Lowe (2006). The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford University Press.
Carol E. Cleland (1990). The Difference Between Real Change and Mere Cambridge Change. Philosophical Studies 60 (3):257 - 280.
Michael Dummett (2000). Is Time a Continuum of Instants? Philosophy 75 (4):497-515.
E. J. Lowe (1991). Real Selves: Persons as a Substantial Kind. Philosophy 29:87-107.
John Earman (2002). Thoroughly Modern Mctaggart: Or, What Mctaggart Would Have Said If He Had Read the General Theory of Relativity. Philosophers' Imprint 2 (3):1-28.
Arda Denkel (1995). Theon's Tale: Does a Cambridge Change Result in a Substantial Change? Analysis 55 (3):166 - 170.
David S. Oderberg (2004). Temporal Parts and the Possibility of Change. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):686–708.
E. J. Lowe (2003). Substantial Change and Spatiotemporal Coincidence. Ratio 16 (2):140–160.
Christopher J. Insole (2000). Why John Hick Cannot, and Should Not, Stay Out of the Jam Pot. Religious Studies 36 (1):25-33.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,900 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
