Reply to Bird on a posteriori essentialism
Analysis 68 (300):345-347 (2008)
| Abstract | No Abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlice Drewery (2004). A Note on Science and Essentialism. Theoria 19 (3):311-320.
Nigel Leary (2007). Natural Kinds: (Thick) Essentialism or Promiscuous Realism? Philosophical Writings 34:5 - 13.
E. J. Lowe (2007). A Problem for a Posteriori Essentialism Concerning Natural Kinds. Analysis 67 (296):286–292.
Alexander Bird (2009). … And Then Again, He Might Not Be. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):517-521.
Alexander Bird (2007). A Posteriori Knowledge of Natural Kind Essences. Philosophical Topics 35 (1-2):293-312.
Alexander Bird (2008). Lowe on a Posteriori Essentialism. Analysis 68 (4):336-344.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads35 ( #34,066 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
