David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):266-71 (1995)
This paper challenges David Chalmers' proposed division of the problems of consciousness into the `easy' ones and the `hard' one, the former allegedly being susceptible to explanation in terms of computational or neural mechanisms and the latter supposedly turning on the fact that experiential `qualia' resist any sort of functional definition. Such a division, it is argued, rests upon a misrepresention of the nature of human cognition and experience and their intimate interrelationship, thereby neglecting a vitally important insight of Kant. From a Kantian perspective, our capacity for conceptual thought is so inextricably bound up with our capacity for phenomenal consciousness that it is an illusion to imagine that there are any `easy' problems of consciousness, resolvable within the computational or neural paradigms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeff Foss (2009). The Scientific Explanation of Colour Qualia. Dialogue 48 (03):479-.
Similar books and articles
Kieron O'Hara & Tom Scutt (1996). There is No Hard Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4):290-302.
David Hodgson (1996). The Easy Problems Ain't so Easy. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):69-75.
Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (2007). Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic.
Dan Zahavi (2003). Intentionality and Phenomenality: A Phenomenological Take on the Hard Problem. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (Supplement):63-92.
Dan Zahavi (2005). Intentionality and Experience. Synthesis Philosophica 2 (40):299-318.
Liam P. Dempsey (2002). Chalmers' Fading and Dancing Qualla. Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):65-80.
Frederick B. Mills (1998). The Easy and Hard Problems of Consciousness: A Cartesian Perspective. Journal of Mind and Behavior 19 (2):119-40.
Ned Block (2001). How Not to Find the Neural Correlate of Consciousness. In João Branquinho (ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1.
Daniel C. Dennett (1996). Facing Backwards on the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1):4-6.
Ned Block (1996). How Not to Find the Neural Correlate of Consciousness. In João Branquinho (ed.), [Book Chapter] (Unpublished). Oxford: Clarendon Press 1.
Ned Block (1998). How to Find the Neural Correlate of Consciousness*: Ned Block. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 43:23-34.
Daniel C. Dennett (1996). Commentary on Chalmers "Facing Backwards on the Problem of Consciousness". Philosophical Explorations.
Max Velmans (1995). The Relation of Consciousness to the Material World. Philosophical Explorations 2 (3):255-65.
Jesse J. Prinz (2005). A Neurofunctional Theory of Consciousness. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press 381-396.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #184,535 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?