David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 6 (1):37 – 57 (1996)
Abstract In what ways was Nietzsche right, from a Buddhist perspective, and where did he go wrong? Nietzsche understood how the distinction we make between this world and a higher spiritual realm serves our need for security, and he saw the bad faith in religious values motivated by this need. He did not perceive how his alternative, more aristocratic values, also reflects the same anxiety. Nietzsche realised how the search for truth is motivated by a sublimated desire for symbolic security; philosophy's attempt to create the world reflects the tyrannical will?to?power, becoming the most ?spiritualised? version of the need to impose our will. Insofar as truth is our intellectual effort to grasp being symbolically, however, Nietzsche overlooks a different reversal of perspective which could convert the ?bad infinite? of heroic will into the good infinite of disseminating play. What he considered the crown of his system?eternal recurrence?is actually its denouement. Having seen through the delusion of Being, Nietzsche still sought a Being within Becoming. Nietzsche is able to affirm the value of this moment only by making it recur eternally. Rather than the way to vanquish nihilism, will?to?power turns out to be pure nihilism, for nihilism is not the debacle of all meaning but our dread of that debacle and what we do to avoid it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1968). The Will to Power. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Keiji Nishitani & Jan van Bragt (1987). Religion and Nothingness. Philosophy East and West 37 (4):458-462.
David Loy (1988). Nonduality: A Study in Comparative Philosophy. Humanities Press.
Graham Parkes (ed.) (1991). Nietzsche and Asian Thought. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Soraj Hongladarom (2011). The Overman and the Arahant : Models of Human Perfection in Nietzsche and Buddhism. Asian Philosophy 21 (1):53-69.
Similar books and articles
Charles H. Pence (2011). Nietzsche’s Aesthetic Critique of Darwin. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (2):165-190.
Lee Spinks (2003). Friedrich Nietzsche. Routledge.
Michael Allen Gillespie (1995). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
Keith Ansell-Pearson (1994). An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Janaway (2007). Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche's Genealogy. Oxford University Press.
Philip J. Kain (2009). Nietzsche and the Horror of Existence. Lexington Books.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads28 ( #147,984 of 1,934,422 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #145,801 of 1,934,422 )
How can I increase my downloads?