American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):23-46 (2012)
|Abstract||Aquinas’s eudaimonism is normally interpreted as twofold in the sense of it dividing into the imperfect, natural happiness of Aristotle and the perfect, supernatural happiness of Augustine. I argue in this work that Aquinas is logically committed to a third type of happiness that, in light of the standard view, rendershis eudaimonism threefold. The paper begins with an overview of the standard twofold model of Aquinas’s eudaimonism; it then turns to the model’s logicalproblem whose solution requires the postulation of a third type of happiness. In the second part of the paper, two clarificatory issues are addressed, several objections are considered, and in closing, I explain why Aquinas’s commitment to a third type of happiness offers the Christian wayfarer grounds for a new optimism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Fred Feldman (2010). What is This Thing Called Happiness? Oxford University Press.
Review author[S.]: John M. Cooper (1995). Eudaimonism and the Appeal to Nature in the Morality of Happiness: Comments on Julia Annas, the Morality of Happiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):587-598.
Fred Feldman (2008). Whole Life Satisfaction Concepts of Happiness. Theoria 74 (3):219-238.
Colleen McCluskey (2000). Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas's Moral Science (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):118-119.
James C. Doig (2000). Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good. Reason and Human Happiness in Aquinas's Moral Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2):303-306.
John M. Connolly (2009). Eudaimonism, Teleology, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):274-296.
J. Porter (1999). Book Reviews : Aquinas on the Twofold Human Good: Reason and Happiness in Aquinas' Moral Science, by Denis J. M. Bradley. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press (London: Eurospan), 1966. 472 Pp. Hb. 39.95. ISBN 0-8132-0861-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 12 (1):88-90.
John M. Cooper (1995). Eudaimonism and the Appeal to Nature in the Morality of Happiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):587 - 598.
T. H. Irwin (2006). Aquinas, Natural Law, and Aristotelian Eudaimonism. In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell Pub..
Bengt Brülde (2004). Happiness and the Good Life. In Christer Svennerlind (ed.), Ursus Philosophicus - Essays Dedicated to Björn Haglund on his Sixtieth Birthday. Philosophical Communications.
Valerie Tiberius & Alicia Hall, Normative Theory and Psychological Research: Hedonism, Eudaimonism and Why It Matters.
Daniel McInerny (2006). The Difficult Good: A Thomistic Approach to Moral Conflict and Human Happiness. Fordham University Press.
Joseph Clair (2013). Wolterstorff on Love and Justice. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):138-167.
Thomas Williams (2005). Aquinas in Dialogue with Contemporary Philosophy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):483-491.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads1 ( #277,406 of 556,888 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,888 )
How can I increase my downloads?