David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (5):287-291 (2006)
Reproductive autonomy is central to women’s welfare both because childbearing takes place in women’s bodies and because they are generally expected to take primary responsibility for child rearing. In 2005, the factors that influence their autonomy most strongly are poverty and belief systems that devalue such autonomy. Unfortunately, such autonomy is a low priority for most societies, or is anathema to their belief systems altogether. This situation is doubly sad because women’s reproductive autonomy is intrinsically valuable for women and also instrumentally valuable for the welfare of humankind. This paper takes for granted the moral and practical necessity of such autonomy and digs deeper into the question of what such a commitment might entail, focusing on the mid-level policy making that, at least in the US and Canada, plays a significant role in shaping women’s options. This paper examines a large teaching hospital’s policy on reduction of multifetal pregnancies. The policy permits reduction of triplets to twins, but not twins to a singleton. As there is no morally relevant difference between these two types of reduction, it is evident that inappropriate medicalisation can still limit women’s autonomy in undesirable ways
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Véronique Fournier, Denis Berthiau, Julie D'Haussy & Philippe Bataille (2013). Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies in France: The Emergence of the Patients' Voice. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (1):55-68.
Similar books and articles
Karey Harwood (2009). Egg Freezing: A Breakthrough for Reproductive Autonomy? Bioethics 23 (1):39-46.
Sylvia Burrow (2012). Reproductive Autonomy and Reproductive Technology. Techne 16 (1):31-45.
Marilyn Friedman (1996). Women's Autonomy and Feminist Aspirations. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:331-340.
Christine Overall (1990). Selective Termination of Pregnancy and Women's Reproductive Autonomy. Hastings Center Report 20 (3):6-11.
Anne Donchin (2009). Toward a Gender-Sensitive Assisted Reproduction Policy. Bioethics 23 (1):28-38.
Sara Goering (2009). Postnatal Reproductive Autonomy: Promoting Relational Autonomy and Self-Trust in New Parents. Bioethics 23 (1):9-19.
Marilyn Friedman (2003). Autonomy, Gender, Politics. Oxford University Press.
Julien S. Murphy (1989). Is Pregnancy Necessary? Feminist Concerns About Ectogenesis. Hypatia 4 (3):66 - 84.
L. M. Purdy (1996). What Can Progress in Reproductive Technology Mean for Women? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5):499-514.
Kristin Zeiler (2004). Reproductive Autonomous Choice – A Cherished Illusion? Reproductive Autonomy Examined in the Context of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (2):175-183.
Susan Dodds (2008). Inclusion and Exclusion in Women's Access to Health and Medicine. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 1 (2):58 - 79.
Serene J. Khader (2008). When Equality Justifies Women's Subjection: Luce Irigaray's Critique of Equality and the Fathers' Rights Movement. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 48-74.
Lisa Campo-Engelstein (2011). No More Larking Around! Why We Need Male LARCs. Hastings Center Report 41 (5):22-26.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads10 ( #205,609 of 1,696,342 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #333,740 of 1,696,342 )
How can I increase my downloads?