The War on Terrorism and the End of Human Rights

Abstract

In the immediate aftermath of September 11, President Bush stated that the perpetrators of the deed would be brought to justice. Soon afterwards, the President announced that the United States would engage in a war on terrorism. The first of these statements adopts the familiar language of criminal law and criminal justice. It treats the September 11 attacks as horrific crimes—mass murders—and the government’s mission as apprehending and punishing the surviving planners and conspirators for their roles in the crimes. The War on Terrorism is a different proposition, however, and a different model of governmental action—not law but war. Most obviously, it dramatically broadens the scope of action, because now terrorists who knew nothing about September 11 have been earmarked as enemies. But that is only the beginning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-08

Downloads
54 (#283,495)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Luban
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

How Did There Come To Be Two Kinds of Coercion?Scott Anderson - 2008 - In David A. Reidy & Walter J. Riker (eds.), Coercion and the State. Springer Verlag. pp. 17-29.
Terrorism.Igor Primoratz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Agamben, Hegel, and the state of exception.Wendell Kisner - 2007 - Cosmos and History 3 (2-3):222-253.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references