Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):269-270 (2004)
|Abstract||According to a multivariate approach on creativity, self-experimentation may well provide many of the conditions that allow for new ideas to occur. This research method is valuable in particular because the researcher's high level of participation in the search for a solution fosters the involvement of the necessary cognitive skills and conative traits.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Mumford, Devin C. Lonergan & Ginamarie Scott (2002). Evaluating Creative Ideas. Inquiry 22 (1):21-30.
Friedrich Steinle (1997). Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):74.
Larry Briskman (1980). Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art. Inquiry 23 (1):83 – 106.
L. Briskman (1981). Creative Product and Creative Process in Science and Art. In Denis Dutton & Michael Krausz (eds.), The Concept of Creativity in Science and Art. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Seth Roberts (2004). Self-Experimentation: Friend or Foe? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):275-287.
Irene Grote (2004). Self-Experimentation and Self-Management: Allies in Combination Therapies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):266-267.
Jane Maienschein (1986). Arguments for Experimentation in Biology. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:180 - 195.
Simon C. Moore & Joselyn L. Sellen (2004). Can the Process of Experimentation Lead to Greater Happiness? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):271-271.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #122,562 of 739,081 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?