Hypatia 20 (1):150-177 (2005)
|Abstract||: Kathryn Paxton George's recent publication, Animal, Vegetable, or Woman? (2000), is the culmination of more than a decade's work and encompasses standard and original arguments against the feminist-vegetarian connection. This paper demonstrates that George's key arguments are deeply flawed, antithetical to basic feminist commitments, and beg the question against fundamental aspects of the debate. Those who do not accept the feminist-vegetarian connection should rethink their position or offer a non-question-begging defense of it|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Lisa Weasel (2001). Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System. Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
Drucilla Cornell (1993). Transformations: Recollective Imagination and Sexual Difference. Routledge.
Kathryn Paxton George (1990). So Animal a Human ..., Or the Moral Relevance of Being an Omnivore. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):172-186.
L. Ryan Musgrave (2003). Liberal Feminism, From Law to Art: The Impact of Feminist Jurisprudence on Feminist Aesthetics. Hypatia 18 (4):214-235.
Louise C. Johnson (2000). Placebound: Australian Feminist Geographies. Oxford University Press.
Deborah Slicer (1992). The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. Environmental Ethics 14 (4):365-369.
Ann J. Cahill (2011). In Defense of Self-Defense. Philosophical Papers 38 (3):363-380.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?