David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
New Vico Studies 3:219-220 (1985)
The language of liberty has long been the despair of exact thinkers. The words "liberty" and "freedom" have been used in a multitude of senses, sometimes inconsistent, often confused, always emotive. But whereas many have thought to deal with similar inexactitude in the use of the word "democracy" by banning it altogether from the vocabulary of politics, few have dared to do so with "liberty" and "freedom". The words are too important and what they stand for is too precious for us to be able to dispense with them altogether, and, rather than ban them, we tend to define them, choosing those definitions that reflect our owi,. predilections or will yield the consequences which will best advance our argument. I am subject to the same temptations myself, and in trying to elucidate the language of liberty, I am viewing it from a definite philosophical standpoint, and may be unwittingly distorting what I see. In particular, I am trying to give a more unitary account of the concept than perhaps the variegated uses of language will admit of, and shall seek to show how the different facets of freedom all stem from the same fundamental concern, and that although we can properly distinguish "freedom to" from "freedom from", and perhaps both from "freedom of', and although the distinction between "negative freedom" and "positive freedom" made famous throughout the Englishspeaking world by Sir Isaiah Berlin's inaugural lecture as Chichele Professor..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Steven Pinker & Paul Bloom (1990). Natural Language and Natural Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):707-27.
A. Charles Catania (1990). What Good is Five Percent of a Language Competence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):729-731.
Michael Studdert-Kennedy (1990). The View of Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):758-759.
Elizabeth Bates & Brian MacWhinney (1990). Welcome to Functionalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):727-728.
Josué Antonio Nescolarde-Selva & Josep-Lluis Usó-Doménech (forthcoming). Myth, Language, and Complex Ideologies. Complexity:n/a-n/a.
Similar books and articles
Eric Nelson (2005). Liberty: One Concept Too Many? Political Theory 33 (1):58 - 78.
Alan Ryan (1965). Freedom. Philosophy 40 (152):93 - 112.
Jonathan Wolff (1997). Freedom, Liberty, and Property. Critical Review 11 (3):345-357.
Mary T. Clark (ed.) (1973). The Problem of Freedom. New York,Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Wells Earl Draughon (2003). What Freedom Is. Writer's Showcase.
Philip Pettit (2006). Freedom in the Market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):131-149.
Ian Hunt (2001). Overall Freedom and Constraint. Inquiry 44 (2):131 – 147.
Diane Enns (2007). Speaking of Freedom: Philosophy, Politics, and the Struggle for Liberation. Stanford University Press.
Jean-Luc Nancy (1993). The Experience of Freedom. Stanford University Press.
Philip Pettit (2005). Liberty and Leviathan. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):131-151.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads8 ( #369,889 of 1,790,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?