Summary of memorandum submitted to Royal commission on reform of the lords
| Abstract | The first task of the Royal Commission, in my view, is to decide what functions the House of Lords should perform. That will determine what powers it ought to have and how it should be constituted. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesRobert Sullivan (2007). First Degree Murder and Complicity—Conditions for Parity of Culpability Between Principal and Accomplice. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (3):271-288.
Earl Winkler (1985). Decisions About Life and Death: Assessing the Law Reform Commission and the Presidential Commission Reports. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 6 (2):74-89.
Marion Maddox (1997). How Late Night Theology Sparked a Royal Commission on Indigenous Australian Beliefs. Sophia 36 (2).
Brenda M. Baker (1996). A Case for Permitting Altruistic Surrogacy. Hypatia 11 (2):34 - 48.
Helen Bosanquet (1913). English Divorce Law and the Report of the Royal Commission. International Journal of Ethics 23 (4):443-455.
A. Maude Royden (1917). Report of the Royal Commission on Venereal Diseases. International Journal of Ethics 27 (2):171-188.
Michael W. Small (1995). Business Ethics and Commercial Morality: Report of the Royal Commission Into Commercial Activities. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (8):613 - 628.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,652 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
