David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Norrington Table is scotched, but not killed. It still appears each year in a national daily, having been compiled by an enterprising graduate with more need for money than time. Some people argue that this shows the futility of trying to suppress the table. But that is not so. In a free society it is open to anyone to obtain information and publish his results. There are many things that people might like to know about colleges. Of greater interest to many than schools results would be the average earnings of graduates of each college five years after going down: that would enable people to pick the best college for repaying student loans, and for enjoying the fruits of worldly success. An enterprising graduate with nothing better to do might go through the university telephone directory, and work out the Ms-ratio for each college and department: no doubt the Daily Telegraph would pay good money for a list of those parts of Oxford that were entirely Ms-free. What is important is not what other people say, but what we say, or seem to endorse its being said, about us. Once the Norrington table appeared to have our imprimatur, it suggested that we set too much score by schools results, and instead of regarding final examinations as a necessary evil, bad, but less bad than any available alternative, we reckoned that getting a good result in schools was the chief..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael P. Maratsos (2004). People Actually Are About as Bad as Social Psychologists Say, or Worse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):351-352.
Roberto Luna-Arocas & Thomas Li-Ping Tang (2004). The Love of Money, Satisfaction, and the Protestant Work Ethic: Money Profiles Among Univesity Professors in the U.S.A. And Spain. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):329-354.
Eddy Nahmias (2011). Why 'Willusionism' Leads to 'Bad Results': Comments on Baumeister, Crescioni, and Alquist. Neuroethics 4 (1):17-24.
Graham Harman (2012). The Third Table. In Katrin Sauerländer (ed.), Documenta: 100 Notes-100 Thoughts. Documenta
Saul Smilansky (2005). On Not Being Sorry About The Morally Bad. Philosophy 80 (2):261-265.
Linzhi Du & Thomas Li-Ping Tang (2005). Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Major: The Love of Money Among University Students in People's Republic of China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):281-293.
James Somerville (2006). ‘The Table, Which We See’: An Irresolvable Ambiguity. Philosophy 81 (1):33-63.
Patañjali & Vinoda Verma (1996). The Yoga Sūtra of Patañjali: A Scientific Exposition with Original Sanskrit Text. Clarion Books.
Kent Swift (2007). Financial Success and the Good Life: What Have We Learned From Empirical Studies in Psychology? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):191 - 199.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #438,913 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?